......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
  Deposition (in re MP) , in collaboration with Julia Eve Preston, 2014. Photo by Katherine Mitchell.   In collaboration with Attorney Julia Eve Preston, a deposition was taken about the character Mary Poppins.  The conversation covered issues of gender, class, and  magical beliefs.  The performance and the resulting document explore law's ability to hold and test the absurd and the fictional. The work exists as a legally viable document.

Deposition (in re MP), in collaboration with Julia Eve Preston, 2014. Photo by Katherine Mitchell. 

In collaboration with Attorney Julia Eve Preston, a deposition was taken about the character Mary Poppins. The conversation covered issues of gender, class, and magical beliefs. The performance and the resulting document explore law's ability to hold and test the absurd and the fictional. The work exists as a legally viable document.

Deposition (in re MP), in collaboration with Julia Eve Preston, 2014. Photo by Katherine Mitchell. 

In collaboration with Attorney Julia Eve Preston, a deposition was taken about the character Mary Poppins. The conversation covered issues of gender, class, and magical beliefs. The performance and the resulting document explore law's ability to hold and test the absurd and the fictional. The work exists as a legally viable document.

  Deposition (in re MP) , in collaboration with Julia Eve Preston, 2014. Photo by Katherine Mitchell.   In collaboration with Attorney Julia Eve Preston, a deposition was taken about the character Mary Poppins.  The conversation covered issues of gender, class, and  magical beliefs.  The performance and the resulting document explore law's ability to hold and test the absurd and the fictional. The work exists as a legally viable document.